Jan 23

Love FilmNews emerged this week that Amazon will buy LOVEFiLM in response to the aggressive expansion plans of Netflix, the American video streaming service. The brainchild of a DVD enthusiast, LOVEFILM developed from humble origins (the founder’s mother’s kitchen, to be precise) in 2004, and soon became one of the great post-dot com success stories, exceeding 1 million members in 2009.

What makes this such an impressive achievement and so distinct from most rapid growth businesses of the last 10 years, is their use of very traditional marketing techniques. It is one thing to pioneer new markets through harnessing new, bleeding-edge technology, but quite another to create one using nothing but existing technology. That really requires imagination, and no small amount of bottle. Well LOVEFiLM had both in abundance. They took a thirty year old movie rental model, combined it with a 350 year old postal service, and walked away with a £200 million deal courtesy of Amazon.

So how did they achieve this quite ridiculous feat? Well great things come in small packages as they say, or in this instance the great thing WAS the small package. Spacious enough to contain up to four DVDs but compact enough to fit through even the least accommodating of letter boxes. But the really ingenious part is what happened after you’d watched it. The design was engineered so that you could simply insert the DVD back in the packaging, throw that in the nearest post box and it would magically find its way back to LOVEFiLM without costing you a penny.

This simple yet brilliant strategy immediately set LOVEFiLM apart from the less dynamic high street rental giants, and helped the company to win the British Video Association’s Rental Success of the Year Home Delivery award in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008!

You may be asking yourself how anyone can get so excited about a piece of cardboard and some pretty archaic marketing and delivery methods. But that’s the point. I admire LOVEFiLM’s achievement precisely because of its simplicity. They took a long established marketing technique, direct mail, and applied great attention to detail both in terms of branding and usability. After years in the industry I know only too well what enormous implications these seemingly trivial details can lead to.

attention to detail comic strip

No doubt Amazon will now have a very different approach in mind for the future of LOVEFiLM. Their goliath presence on the web will surely see the model move rapidly towards an exclusively virtual experience. And rightly so. In a world characterised by constant and unrelenting change, it is often a company’s willingness to embrace and manage such change that will determine its ability to survive. But for me, regardless of any future success they achieve through the use of new, ground-breaking technology, their distinguishing characteristic and most enduring achievement will always be their early ability to distinguish themselves through nothing more than a user-centric mentality and fantastic attention to detail.

There is a more valuable and practical lesson for young marketers in this story than in any number of technology-fuelled Facebooks, Googles or Twitters – you don’t necessarily need better things to do things better!

Craig.

Tagged with:
Dec 10

RE: Xerox’s iGen4 has the colour accuracy to take digital print into packaging, Andrew Tribute, PrintWeek, 27 November 2009

In response to this article I emailed Andrew Tribute to clarify a point.

AT: “the really interesting comment came when comparing colour variance from iGen3 to iGen4: the variance was only one Delta E Colour, variance between offset presses typically measures between three and five Delta E.”

CJ: “I believe that I am correct in saying that digital print is not encompassed within the framework set out by 12647-2. However, as you talk of variance, which is an impressive level produced by the iGen4, is the target Delta E comparable to the one set out for offset? And as such how do the printed results compare to the naked eye?”

AT: “I really cannot answer the question as my quote was taken from the quality control manage of one of the leading and largest photobook suppliers in the world. They  have HP Indigo 5500, Xerox iGen3 and iGen4 presses. His comment was purely on measurement of the results on the iGen4 taking account of page to page repeatability over a run. Since the company does not run any offset they cannot comment on how the output compares. In terms of 12647 digital print is not covered within 12647-2 nor in any of the other iterations of 12647. One day perhaps it will be! Sorry I cannot be of more help.” He adds, “One additional point. The variance of 1 delta E is better than can be achieved by offset however this is not surprising as there are far fewer variables in the digital process than the offset process.”

Well it appears that that day is about to arrive as prompted by this article gleaned from Printspeak.

This lead me to check it out with the ISO and it would appear that ISO12647-8 is ‘under review’ – The dawn of another new era I suspect!

Tagged with:
preload preload preload